🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved positions for Indigenous council members on NZ local authorities will be slashed by over 50%, after a divisive legislative amendment that required local governments to put the future of hard-earned Indigenous wards to a public vote.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Māori wards, which may have multiple elected officials depending on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to elect a guaranteed Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, local governments were only able to create a Indigenous seat by first putting it to a public vote in their area. Local populations often devoted considerable time building local support and urging their councils to create Indigenous representation.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration permitted municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to put it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, saying communities ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation required councils that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to hold binding referendums alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on October 11. Of 42 councils taking part in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their wards, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes provided “a vital step in reinstating community self-determination.”

Critics however have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures designed to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has said it wants to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and says it is dedicated to enhancing results for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the public votes were split down urban-rural lines – most cities required to vote backed Māori wards, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with less than a third of citizens participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to establish different electoral districts – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The different conditions placed on Indigenous representation suggested the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This statement concerned the 17 areas that chose to keep their wards.