🔗 Share this article

Picture this: a smiling Rasmus Højlund in a Napoli shirt. Now, juxtapose that with a sad-looking the Slovenian forward in a Manchester United kit, looking as if he's missed a sitter. Don't bother locating an actual photo of that miss; context is the enemy. Then, include some goal stats in a large, silly font. Don't forget the emojis. Share the image everywhere.

Will you point out that Højlund's goal count includes strikes in the premier European competition while his counterpart isn't playing in continental tournaments? Of course not. And would you highlight that several of Højlund's goals were scored versus weaker national sides, or that Denmark is much stronger to Sesko's Slovenia and generates many more scoring opportunities. You manage online for a major brand, raw interaction is your livelihood, United are the prime target, and nuance is your sworn enemy.

Thus the wheel of content turns. Your next task is to scan a lengthy interview featuring the legendary goalkeeper and extract the part where he describes the signing of Sesko "weird". Just before, where he qualifies his comments by saying, "Nothing negative to say about Benjamin Sesko"... well, remove that part. No one wants that. Just make sure "weird" and "the player" are paired in the headline. People will be outraged.

This Time of Promise and Hasty Opinions

Mid-autumn has long been one of my favourite times to watch football. The leaves swirl, winds shift, the teams and tactics are newly formed, all is novel and yet patterns are emerging. The stars of the coming months are staking their claims. The summer market is shut. Nobody is talking about the quadruple yet. All teams are in contention. At this precise point, all is possibility.

However, for similar reasons, mid-autumn has long been one of my most disliked times to consume news on football. Because although no outcomes are decided, opinions must be formed immediately. Jack Grealish is resurgent. The German talent has been a major letdown. Could Semenyo be the best player in the league right now? Please an answer immediately.

Sesko as Patient Zero

In many ways, Sesko feels like the archetype in this respect, a player caught between football's two countervailing, unavoidable forces. The imperative to delay final conclusions, to let technical development and tactical sophistication to develop. And the demand to generate permanent verdicts, a conveyor belt of takes and memes, context-free criticisms and meaningless comparisons, a puzzle that can not truly be solved.

I do not propose to provide a in-depth analysis of Sesko's stint at United to date. He has started four times in the Premier League in a highly unpredictable team, found the net twice, and taken a mere of 116 contacts with the ball. What exactly are we analysing? Nor will I attempt to duplicate Gary Neville's and Ian Wright's notable debate "The Sesko Debate", in which two famous analysts duel passionately on a podcast over whether Sesko needs 10 goals to be deemed successful this year (one pundit), or whether it is more like twelve or thirteen (the other).

A Harsh Reality

For all this I enjoyed watching him at his former club: a big, screeching racing car of a forward, playing in a team ideally suited to his abilities: afforded the license to rampage but also the freedom to miss. And in part this is why United feels like the most unforgiving place he could possibly be right now: a place where "brutal verdicts" are handed down in roughly the duration it takes to watch a pre-roll ad, the club with the largest and most ruthless gap between the patience and space he requires, and the opportunity he is likely to receive.

We saw a case of this over the national team pause, when a widely shared chart conveniently stated that Sesko had been judged – by a wide margin – the worst signing of the recent market by a poll of 20 agents. And of course, the press are by no means alone in this. Club channels, influencers, anonymous X accounts with a oddly high number of pornbot followers: all parties with skin in the game is now essentially operating along the identical rules, an environment explicitly nosed towards controversy.

The Mental Cost

Scroll, scroll, tap, scroll. What are we doing to us? Are we aware, on any level, what this infinite stream of aggravation is doing to our brains? Separate from the inherent strangeness of playing in the middle of it all, knowing on a bizarre butterfly-effect level that each aspect about them is now essentially content, commodity, public property to be packaged and traded.

Indeed, partly this is because United are United, the entity that keeps nourishing the narrative, a major institution that must always be generating the strong emotions. But also, in part this is a seasonal affliction, a pendulum of opinion most clearly and cruelly glimpsed at this season, about a month after the window has closed. Throughout the summer we have been desiring players, eulogising them, salivating over them. Now, only a handful of games later, many of those same players are already being dismissed as failures. Is it time to worry about Jamie Gittens? Was Arsenal's purchase of their striker necessary? What was the purpose of another expensive buy?

The Bigger Picture

It seems fitting that he faces their rivals on Sunday: a team at once on a long unbeaten run at home in the Premier League and somehow in their own situation of perceived turmoil, like submitting a missing person’s report on someone who popped to the shops 30 minutes ago. Defensively suspect. Their star finished. Alexander Isak waste of money. Arne Slot bald.

Maybe we have failed to understand the way the storyline of football has begun to supplant football the actual game, to influence the way we view it, an whole competition reoriented around talking points and immediate responses, an activity that happens in the background while we scroll through our devices, unable to detach from the constant flow of takes and further hot takes. It may be this player bearing the brunt at present. But in a way, everyone is losing something here.